Feel free to write my name in if you’d like to — or someone else’s! Or even to go to court to demand that your vote be counted rather than discarded due to the uniparty’s “ballot access” schemes.
But after looking over the requirements to be an “official” write-in candidate, I just don’t see that it’s worth the trouble.
So far, my investment in time and effort has been minimal. It cost me less than $20 to run more than one million banner advertisements, which generated a grand total of zero voter/media inquiries, and I’ve spent a few minutes here and there discussing my “campaign” with friends, and that’s about it. It’s been real, it’s been fun, but I can’t say it’s been real fun, because I’ve been unwilling to do the work of MAKING it real fun.
Hey, I’ve still got the domain name to play with, though … so this site may disappear and be replaced soon!
All the time, but more frequently and urgently as each presidential election draws near, analysts and pundits agonize over which “major party” candidate is hurt most by independent and third party candidates: Will, for example, the Green nominee “spoil” the election for the Democrat and “hand it to” the Republican, or will the Libertarian nominee have the opposite effect?
The controversy of the moment concerns a group called “No Labels,” which may attempt to put a presidential candidate on government-printed ballots in 2024. “Democratic strategists and anti-Trump Republican operatives have concluded,” David Corn writes at Mother Jones, “that its effort could siphon more votes from President Joe Biden than Donald Trump.”
But the only votes in Biden’s and Trump’s gas tanks are their own (and the No Labels candidate is unlikely to receive either of those votes).
Your vote is in your gas tank, and belongs to you — not to Joe Biden, Donald Trump, or anyone else — until you cast it.
It’s arrogant of those analysts and pundits to assume that Democrats and/or Republicans own or are owed your vote as a matter of entitlement because, well, they’re the big guys, and that you’re essentially stealing it from them if you cast it for some other candidate. They’re not entitled to your vote, and when you cast that vote for the candidate you evaluate as having earned it, it doesn’t come “from” some other candidate.
Naturally, I hope to be your candidate of choice. But if I’m not, I won’t complain that Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Cornel West, or some other candidate “siphoned” your vote “from” me.
How do we know that a president can be elected as a write-in candidate? Because 18 of them have been:
George Washington
John Adams
Thomas Jefferson
James Madison
James Monroe
John Quincy Adams
Andrew Jackson
Martin Van Buren
William Henry Harrison
James K. Polk
Zachary Taylor
Franklin Pierce
James Buchanan
Abraham Lincoln
Ulysses S. Grant
Rutherford B. Hayes
James A. Garfield
Grover Cleveland
That is, every president elected through the year 1884 (John Tyler, Millard Fillmore, Andrew Johnson, and Chester A. Arthur were never elected to the presidency; they ascended to it from the vice-presidency when their predecessors died in office).
After the 1884 election, states began adopting the “Australian ballot” — a ballot printed by the government, which of course was allowed to decide whose names could be on it.
Before that, Americans voted by writing down the names of the candidates they supported, or (if they couldn’t write) telling an election official to write those names down for them, or using a ballot given printed and given to them by their parties or other associations of choice.
Yes, the United States was smaller then — only 38 states, with fewer than 10 million votes cast in the 1884 presidential election. On the other hand, election authorities in Grover Cleveland’s time didn’t have computers and optical scanners that could recognize text.
I’d say that 18 presidents is reasonably good proof of concept, wouldn’t you?